JoshuaColin.com
  • Home
  • About
  • Writing
  • Research
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About
  • Writing
  • Research
  • Contact

As Seen on TV: The Top 10 Medical Lies My Television Told Me

3/12/2019

0 Comments

 
Years before I embarked on the road to becoming an emergency physician, one of my first exposures to the specialty was the television show ER. There are many reasons I ultimately chose this career path, but I'd be lying if I said ER didn't put the idea in my head. Even after all this time, the very first episode rings true and that cheesy, 1990s-style theme song brings a smile to my face. It's not perfect, but the world of Carter, Greene, and Benton gets a lot of the culture and the medicine right. Scrubs was also a big favorite of mine. While it doesn't claim to tackle the science accurately, it does a great job of representing the culture of medicine, especially the dark humor, hierarchy, pressure to succeed and the weight of responsibility for others. Ironically, both of these shows have been a source of comfort and a reminder of why I went into medicine during some of the more difficult periods of training.

But this post isn't about my favorite medical shows. Instead, it's about the ways the medical dramas so often get things wrong (ER and Scrubs included), those things that make doctors cringe and are sure to have me standing up and shouting at the television mid-episode. From emergency surgery to cardiac arrest, seizures to organ donation, there's a lot of the medical field that these shows misrepresent and misconceptions that they perpetuate. I’ll always love a good medical drama (or comedy),  but here are my top ten medical missteps, mistakes and downright lies as seen on TV.

1. "We have to remove the bullet!"
Despite the compelling scenes enabled by this plot device, it still drives me crazy. A character is shot, oftentimes in the abdomen, and ultimately undergoes a painful extraction of the bullet fragment (whenever suits the plot). Sweat drips from the surgeon's face as he pulls it out, usually with the help of some liquor as an antiseptic, the patient screaming or perhaps gritting their teeth stoically. And with a few hours of rest, that same character is ready to go like nothing even happened (though he or she is obligated to wince from time to time just to remind us). As it turns out, you can still bleed to death from a vascular injury (in seconds) or liver laceration (in minutes to hours) or die a horrible painful death from a perforated bowel and sepsis (in hours to days). Taking the bullet out fixes none of these problems and has a reasonable chance of making things worse. After learning the anatomy and running real-life penetrating traumas, these scenes just demand too much suspension of disbelief.
​2. "Clear!"
It's true that we do say "clear" in the emergency department, though perhaps not as often as on ER or House. This inaccuracy lies more in the delivery. First of all, this doesn't happen nearly as often (which is good because it means someone is on the brink of death). And though it's often a tense moment, this phrase is about communication, not drama. More often, you're going to hear something like, "I'm clear, you're clear, everyone's clear," in a measured voice. Charging in with the paddles defeats the purpose, as 'clear' is about keeping everyone else safe from the electrical shock being delivered to the patient.
​3. "We've placed him in an induced coma."
The concept of a coma is tremendously misunderstood, and television shares at least some of the blame. The term is used carelessly and imprecisely (with tragic consequences) for other types of conditions - such as persistent vegetative state and brain death - from which people do not recover. Some people - for example, those with traumatic brain injury (TBI) - can recover and eventually "wake up". But sadly many with severe underlying brain injury will never wake up and this television inaccuracy can create false hope, leading to suffering for patients and families.
4. "STAT!"
"Stat", like many words in medicine, is derived from Latin (statim meaning 'instantly' or 'immediately'). Pretty much everything in the emergency department is STAT (especially in comparison with the rest of the hospital), so it's really not necessary to say it out loud, much less shout it. If you tell a seasoned ED nurse that something is STAT, you are guaranteed to get an eye roll as they go back to whatever they were doing. The only folks I know who still say stat without a hint of irony are neurosurgeons, and they are in a class of their own. After all, it literally is brain surgery.
5. "He's flatlining! Charging... clear!"
​​Sorry, this one is just wrong. Delivering an electronic shock via defibrillator is a method of converting someone from a non-perfusing, disorganized rhythm (ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation) and resetting their heart to a normal sinus rhythm. You cannot shock someone out of asystole (no rhythm or electrical activity) or pulseless electrical activity (electrical activity but no rhythm) because there is no mechanical rhythm to reset. All you can do is continue CPR, push epinephrine, and think about reversible causes (and cross your fingers). Put the paddles down, doctor. And speaking of which....
6. Those paddles
Maybe this one isn't so much of an inaccuracy as it is outdated. The television show ER was my first introduction into the field of emergency medicine. And, while I definitely didn't mention this in my residency interviews, at least some small percentage of my choice of speciality came directly from watching it. Gosh darn it, I just want to use those paddles one time, is that too much to ask?! But alas, as it turns out its safer and quicker to apply defibrillation through large sticky pads. Less badass, unfortunately, but in the end better for our patients and safer for the ED team. (Fortunately, the paddles do still exist, and I’ve had the chance to use them!)
7. Successful Resuscitation
Unfortunately, television shows and movies drastically overstate the success of resuscitation. If a patient becomes so ill that their heart stops, there are often forces at work that are irreversible, even with the very best medical care and high quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). This is especially true in cardiac arrest due to causes like blunt trauma (e.g. a car accident), advanced infection or cancer. Successful resuscitation is more likely in situations such as respiratory arrest leading to cardiac arrest or in penetrating trauma, such as a stab wound, in which there is an isolated injury that can be temporized and then corrected surgically. But even in scenarios with better odds, the rate of survival is still quite low, at best about 1 in 3 and at worst about 1 in 100. The numbers are much worse when you exclude patients that suffer neurological injury even if their bodies survive. The television portrayal of CPR was even the subject of a 1996 New England Journal of Medicine article which catalogued medical television dramas and found that 75% of patients depicted were resuscitated and 67% left the hospital alive. Sadly, this just isn’t the case.
8. Spending time with McSteamy
I'm sure it does happen from time to time, but certainly not with the frequency portrayed on television. Though emotions can run high in the hospital setting, it is still our office. Plus the stained mattresses of shared call rooms, crowded supply closets and the blood, urine and vomit of the work day aren't exactly aphrodisiacs. That's not to say that relationships don't catch their spark and blossom in the hospital. They certainly do, especially given the seemingly endless hours of residency make your co-workers some of the only people you see on a regular basis. But the rest is better left for the bedroom, rather than the supply closet.
9. "He's seizing!"
Seizures tend to be a very misunderstood condition as well. They look very dramatic and this causes others to respond in dramatic fashion. The disconnect here has always bothered me. Even in this hospital setting, seizures tend to receive outsized attention. A patient who experiences a seizure that stops after a few minutes is almost certainly going to be fine. In contrast, someone with cardiac chest pain and EKG abnormalities has a very real chance of dying any minute even though they are awake and talking to you. Television has certainly contributed to some of the problematic treatment of seizures as well. Specifically 1) trying to restrain a seizing patient and 2) trying to put something in the patient’s mouth. In reality, these are the last things you should do. What someone should do if they witness a seizure is make sure that the patient is an a position and location where they are at minimal risk of harming themselves.
10. Organ donation
Last but not least: organ donation! Donation of organs after death is also a very misunderstood area that is perpetuated by depictions on television. In reality, donation is a very rigorous process that requires specific guidelines and permission in order to move forward. In particular cases, including donation of heart or lungs, which can only come from a brain-dead donor, this involves even further stringent medical testing to confirm brain death. Things that NEVER, EVER happen include 1) deciding whether to resuscitate someone based on their donor status, 2) deciding whether to ‘pull the plug’ based on their donor status, 3) reserving an organ for a specific person from a deceased or brain-dead donor. If you’ve ever come across these misconceptions, I encourage you to learn more about organ donation and become a donor yourself.
0 Comments

Flu Fears: Top 5 Misconceptions About Influenza

11/8/2018

2 Comments

 
PictureCredit: MedicalGraphics.de, license CC BY-ND 4.0
Last year's flu season was a nasty one and this year's is just getting started. In my emergency department, we've begun to see a trickle of cases that is almost certain to herald an incoming surge. So brace yourselves, winter is coming.

If you're experiencing flu symptoms (fever, chills, cough, sore throat, body aches, malaise, headache, vomiting and/or diarrhea), supportive care and time are unfortunately the only true avenues for relief (more on this later). Hopefully, you have an ample supply of Tylenol, tea, ginger ale and chicken soup. For the rest of you - flu vaccinated or just lucky - I want to set the record straight on some common flu misconceptions.

In a social media post last flu season, my colleague Dr. Kim Sue (Massachusetts General Hospital, Internal Medicine) jokingly captured the frustration we feel as providers:

Patient: “Aren’t people dying from getting flu shots this year? That’s what I heard.”
Me: “From your doctor (i.e. me)? People are dying from not getting it. Getting intubated.
​Let me jam this vaccine into your arm with the force if my accumulated anger hearing these ongoing misconceptions.”

Patient: “Fine, you always make me get it every year anyway.”
Me: “Good for me for having the fortitude to have this conversation with you every year.”
For providers, it often feels as though we are repeating ourselves year after year, answering the same questions and trying to quash the same misinformation. As a physician, I respect patient's autonomy to choose whether or not to get the flu vaccine each year. But what is equally important to me is that they make this choice based on sound information and also realize that this choice affects others in a meaningful way, including some of the most vulnerable among us.

1. I have the flu.
As it turns out, not all illnesses that make you feel terrible are the flu. There are many potential causes of why we inevitably find ourselves under 5 blankets with a box of tissues, a mug of tea, the entire contents of our medicine cabinet and a long Netflix queue at least once every winter. These include rhinovirus (the common cold), coronavirus, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), adenovirus, and parainfluenza among others. Less commonly, this same set of symptoms can also be a harbinger of other more ominous diagnoses such as meningitis or appendicitis. If you're ill enough to come to the hospital, we can run a pretty accurate PCR swab to confirm a case of influenza, but this ends up happening in a minority of cases. If you are feeling better within 1-2 days and you don't spike a true fever (>101.4˚ F), it probably wasn't the flu.

2. The flu shot doesn't work.
The effectiveness of flu vaccination over the last several years has varied from 19-60%. This reality becomes easily warped into the myth that the shot doesn’t work at all. The truth is that the flu is a virus with numerous strains and a high rate of mutations which makes vaccine design a tricky business. Somewhere off in a lab each year, very smart people are thoughtfully making an educated estimate of the impending flu strains, several months in advance. And it simply is not possible to do this with 100% accuracy. By the time the vaccine has been manufactured and disseminated we can only wait and see how effective it will be for a given season. So yes, it is possible, as some patients will tell me that “I got the flu shot last year but I still got the flu". But that doesn’t negate the other truth that it saved lives, decreased illness and hospitalization and protected unvaccinated patients via partial herd immunity.
Have you heard of herd immunity? 
I'm not sure that I will ever be able to explain herd immunity to someone who doesn't want to hear it, but that will never stop me from trying. Herd immunity is essentially indirect protection from an infectious disease due to a large portion of the population being immune (either naturally or via vaccination). If immunity covers a sufficient number of people, it indirectly protects people that are non-immune by making it much more difficult for the infection to spread. Breakdown of herd immunity due to lower vaccination rates is what has caused public health crises such as outbreaks of (very preventable) measles. In the case of the flu, the vaccine isn't effective enough to produce complete herd immunity, but we still get some of its beneficial effects including decreased transmission and partial protection of vulnerable populations.
3. The flu shot gave me the flu.
Typically, patients receive a trivalent or quadrivalent (3 or 4-strain) flu vaccination which can be grown via egg-culture, cell-culture or recombinant techniques or, less commonly, a live-attenuated intranasal vaccine. The bottom line is that all forms of the vaccine contain inactivated virus (traditional), weakened virus (intranasal) or simply parts of the flu virus (recombinant), none of which is capable of actually giving you the flu. Yes, you can get 1-2 days of malaise, fatigue, low grade fever and muscle aches after getting the vaccine, which is part of your body's normal immune response. Overall, the vaccine is well-tolerated and serious adverse events are very rare (much rarer than serious complications of the flu).  Those couple of days of feeling run down are nothing compared to 3-7 days of debilitating symptoms with up to 2 weeks total recovery time for uncomplicated flu cases.
​
4. There's a cure for the flu.

Yes, there is an antiviral medication out there that has some degree of activity against the flu virus. It’s called olsetamivir, but more commonly recognized by its trade name Tamiflu (the other FDA-approved antiviral is zanamivir or Relenza). It is true that it does something and the CDC does recommend that physicians “consider” administering it to flu patients in general and give it to high-risk patients. Overall, the available evidence* around Tamiflu, which was largely funded by industry, suggests that when given early in the flu course (in the initial 24-48 hours) that tamiflu decreases the duration of symptoms by less than one day. And it is not without risk of side effects, including increased incidence of confusion and psychiatric events, headache and nausea/vomiting. Turns out that there is an effective treatment that cuts flu symptoms to zero days! The flu shot! No, it’s not perfect but it’s quite a bit more perfect than Tamiflu.

Of note, there is also a new, single-dose flu medication, called baloxavir (Xofluza) that was just approved by the FDA this October. The new drug was approved based on two clinical trials which showed a faster recovery time versus placebo, specifically about 23-28 hours. It isn't clearly better than Tamiflu, but the jury is still out on how it will perform in the general population.
Picture
Tamiflu: 16.8 hours of flu symptom relief!
*Despite being FDA approved in 1999, it wasn't until 2014 that all clinical trial data was made fully available. For much of this period, despite significant national spending on Tamiflu, much of the data remained unpublished or selectively published by Roche Pharmaceuticals.

5. It's just the flu.
Although the exact number of flu related fatalities is difficult to calculate, the CDC estimates that during the period from 2010 to 2015, annual flu-related deaths ranged from 12,000 to 56,000. Last year, it was over 80,000! An estimated 90 percent of deaths occurred in patients over 65 years old. Many of these patients died of complications of the flu, such as pneumonia, and had other co-morbid conditions that put them at higher risk. Young children, older adults (>65), pregnant women and those with asthma, COPD, heart disease and other conditions have a higher mortality risk. Yet each flu season, there are also fatalities among otherwise healthy children and adults.

​Also important to realize is that it may be 'just the flu' for most healthy patients, but it can also affect more vulnerable populations. The flu vaccinated patient has a decreased chance of contracting the flu (though non-zero) and if they never get sick then they never expose others. The non-vaccinated patient who does get sick continues to spread the flu virus potentially to the elderly, small children, asthmatics and other groups in which flu mortality is higher.

I will never tire of giving a (educational) rant on the topic of vaccination and public health. I hope that in some small way this post can help fend off the onslaught of misinformation that troubles the internet and help contribute to reasoned discourse and scientific understanding on this topic.

​Feel better, America!
2 Comments

Getting Back to Writing

8/3/2018

0 Comments

 
When I was growing up, there were two things that I wanted to be more than anything: a doctor and a writer. Before I pursued medical training, my very first dream was to be a novelist. My childhood journals and old home computer were always littered with story ideas and the beginnings of novels. Even as I prepared for a career in medicine, I also maintained my love of storytelling and writing. I majored in American History & Literature while doing my pre-med classes, I pursued a journalism degree prior to going on to medical school and I started working as a freelance writer. When I began residency in Emergency Medicine in 2015, I knew that writing would have to take a backseat as I completed my clinical training, but it's also something I've missed a great deal over these past few years.

That is why I’m so excited to share my new essay, "Exposed," which appears in the latest issue of Annals of Emergency Medicine. I’m grateful for the opportunity to join these two passions, to take an experience in medical training that was challenging and formative and share it with others in my specialty through creative writing.
Picture

This essay centers on an experience that I hope will resonate with other healthcare providers: the dreaded needlestick injury. The piece examines the constant threat of the unknown that all clinicians come to know well, a fear that also helps keep us sharp and ready for anything that comes through the door. I attempt to capture how this anxiety and uncertainty mix with the thrill of discovery and capability during medical training. The lesson for me was that such an experience reveals an inherent truth of our field: the risks and rewards of medical practice are inextricably linked.

You can read my essay, “Exposed” for free until September 7, 2018 here:

​https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196064418300763

​Thanks for reading!

0 Comments

Thanks for your support!

1/31/2018

0 Comments

 

Thanks so much to all my friends and colleagues for voting for my submission to the 2018 Essentials of EM - Academic Life in EM Visual Design Competition. Congratulations to the winners, Dr. Liz Fierro and Dr. Natasha Li from Loma Linda University Health! While my entry was not selected for the grand prize, I was happy to see that it garnered the most views of all the submissions (over 6,000 as of this post). I'm very grateful for the exposure and all the supportive feedback from my EM colleagues.

I'm including the full submission in the link below (high resolution png file). Please feel free to download, use and share. Thanks again for all of your support. I look forward to submitting again next year!

Infographic Calcium Channel Blocker Overdose
File Size: 2104 kb
File Type: png
Download File

Picture
0 Comments

Visual Design Competition Semifinalist

1/26/2018

0 Comments

 
Infographic: Prescription Calcium Channel Blocker Overdose, A Rapid Review of Medical Management
I am very excited to announce that I have been selected as a semifinalist for the 2018 Academic Life in EM - Essentials of EM Visual Design Competition!

4 semifinalists were selected from submissions in various topics in emergency medicine. My submission was inspired by my recent blog post (see below) and is an infographic on management of calcium-channel blocker overdoses. The winner of the competition is selected for an EM Education Mini-Fellowship and is awarded travel to this year’s EEM Conference in Las Vegas in May 2018 where they support multiple aspects of the conference.

VOTE HERE

My entry

 
​I would greatly appreciate your support! Voting is open to the public until 
Saturday, January 27 at 8pm. Please feel free to share!
0 Comments

SAS, Episode 1: Calcium Channel Blocker Overdose

1/4/2018

0 Comments

 
Recently, I took care of my first patient with a major calcium channel blocker (CCB) overdose. He was a middle aged man with unknown past medical history who had reportedly taken 20 tablets of diltiazem 120mg ER in a suicide attempt. Initial blood pressure in the field was 60/32, heart rate 30-40s. Knowing on an abstract level how sick these patients can get is one thing. Seeing it firsthand is something else entirely. Here are some lessons learned from a harrowing toxicological encounter.
​
  1. Resist the urge to panic. This was by far one of the sickest patients that I've ever seen. Refractory shock, altered mental status, agitation, erratic blood sugars. When the CMED call comes in, center yourself, run your list and make sure you have the resources you need, because you'll be in that room for the foreseeable future. You'll need a plan for how to cover other acutely ill patients under your care. Keep calm, anticipate possible interventions (and the requisite equipment), and prep your team (especially your primary nurse).
  2. 1-800-222-1222. Speaking of asking for help, the mind of an experienced EM-trained toxicologist is just a phone call away. Although most EM practitioners are comfortable with a tylenol, opioid or benzodiazepine overdose, this is the kind of case where you should have a toxicologist whispering in your ear. There's a great deal happening at once and it's near impossible to step away from the bedside to look up the myriad interventions you'll be pursuing. A poison control consultation can help guide you through a tricky set of treatments and counsel you on the most challenging parts of the case, such as whether to give lipid emulsion therapy or transfer to an ECMO center.
  3. Just put the central line in. ​The situation is almost certainly going to get worse before it gets better, and you need access. You know right out of the gate that you'll be giving: 1) IV calcium in high doses, 2) high-dose vasopressors, 3) large volumes of IV fluid and 4) a multitude of other drugs (see below). Ergo, a central line is practically guaranteed. In my experience, I've been lulled into a universe of easy peripheral access. Our nurses are outstanding at blind PIVs. Need volume? A 14-18g will do the trick. Need pressors? Well, low dose peripheral pressors are ok (for a while). Tough access? Grab the ultrasound machine. But in the sick calcium channel blocker overdose patient you've immediately committed yourself to 4 or more drips (plus high dose pressors and high volume). You're best served by walking into the room with a plan to drop a line (and a kit in your hands).
  4. Do everything. In emergency medicine, we are used to acting quickly based on limited information, but we also tend to want to observe the effect of our interventions prior to pursuing more aggressive ones. This is one clinical scenario in which multiple simultaneous interventions are recommended. These include:
    1. IV crystalloid - bolus 500cc-1L, repeat as needed
    2. ​Atropine - 0.5-1mg IV up to 3mg
    3. IV calcium - 10 to 20mL of 10% calcium chloride over 10 minutes (via central line), repeat up to 4 times every 20 minutes OR 30 to 60 mL of 10% calcium gluconate
    4. Glucagon - 5mg IV bolus, repeat 2 times every 10 minutes up to 15mg total
    5. Vasopressors - Levophed (norepinephrine) is the pressor of choice.
    6. High-dose insulin. And I mean, really, high-dose insulin. Half the battle will be convincing yourself and your staff that it's OK to bolus 100 units of regular insulin IV in a non-diabetic patient. Insulin causes a positive inotropic effect in CCB toxicity and counteracts the refractory hyperglycemia produced in such overdoses. So,
      1. ​If blood sugar is < 150, give D50; replete K;
      2. Bolus 1u/kg regular IV;
      3. Give continuous insulin 0.5/kg/hr IV, max 10u/kg/hr;
      4. Titrate to euglycemia with 5-10% dextrose.
    7. End of the Line. ​If nothing is working, then the following are your final stops in addressing a CCB overdose:
      1. ​​Intralipid (IV lipid emulsion). 1-1.5 mL/kg of 20% lipid emulsion solution. This should be done in consultation with a toxicologist. (An important aside: ​hemodialysis is not effective in these cases)
      2. Transcutaneous / transvenous pacing / aortic balloon pump. Given that these overdoses can produce a refractory mixed shock, you may need to try pacing in some form or get an interventional cardiologist on board.
      3. ECMO. If all else fails, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is an option, but may require transferring a highly unstable patient to an ECMO center. Additionally, one caveat I learned in the course of caring for this patient, is that you cannot give intralipid and then place them on ECMO as it causes problems with the circuit.
  5. ​Get to the ICU. These patients will be extremely resource intensive for the entire duration of their ED course. In this case, my patient needed one-to-one nursing (often with the help of 1-2 additional nurses) and I was physically in the room for nearly the entire time. It was fortunate that I was in a place and at a time of day where this was possible. But if resources are tight or coverage is light, this patient could quickly tax the department as a whole. The interventions you'll be applying are also numerous and dynamic in nature. This is exactly what the ICU exists for and you should hyper-aware of disposition for these patients. You need to protect your patient and your department by getting them to a high level of care as quickly as possible.

Fortunately, this patient did well and ultimately did not need any 'end-of-the-line' therapies. This was a challenging yet valuable first brush with one of the sickest of all types of overdose patients. Like all difficult cases in the ED, teamwork and good communication were the bedrock of successfully managing the overdose.
Picture
Picture
0 Comments

SAS, Episode 0: The Unforgettable Cases

1/4/2018

0 Comments

 
Picture
In the emergency department, we deal with a large volume of sick patients. Not only are many acutely ill, but they are often undifferentiated. Our daily lives include encounters with sepsis, STEMI, and shock and no shortage of other surprises. As a result, we develop a certain level of comfort with these high-stress situations.

Yet there are some encounters that move beyond even the daily ebb and flow of high acuity. These are the scenarios that make us break out in a cold sweat as the CMED call comes in. The ones that can form a knot in our stomachs even days or years later. Every clinician has cases like these that are seared into their memory, cases that help us grow as doctors.

We sometimes refer to such patients as 'sick as stink' (SAS) - or even use a slightly more colorful version of the phrase. Though couched in the typical irreverence of the ED, this reference is not used in a derogatory manner. In fact, the expression is one of humility for the ways in which medicine can always continue to surprise and challenge us. It communicates a necessity for vigilance to our colleagues. It is an admission of how much a case affects us. These are the patients whose faces we can conjure effortlessly, who will become a symbol of what we learned, the unforgettable cases.

​SAS will be a recurring column on this site, a collection of my most memorable cases (de-identified as always). They will be mainly educational (rather than esoteric), meant to consolidate and share what I learned from these high stress encounters. I hope you enjoy the first installment!

SAS - Episode 1

​-J
0 Comments

Welcome back

12/18/2017

0 Comments

 
PictureCredit: Allan Ajifo
As I near the halfway point of my third year as an emergency medicine resident, I've been inspired to shake the cobwebs and dust out of the right side of my brain and start writing again. In a previous life, I was a journalist and research writer, but after four long years of medical school and about two-thirds of my residency, that person started to feel a little foreign to me. After finally completing a long-term research project and experiencing the pride of seeing it in print,  I began to long for the different but just as powerful feeling of crafting writing born of creativity and imagination rather than spreadsheets and statistics. Starting with the clinical training of my third year of medical school, I've had less and less time for these activities. But I promised myself when I started out at medical school that this part of me would not disappear, that even if it went into a period of hibernation, I would bring it back to light. Now I finally feel that a cloud has started to lift. As the scaffolding of emergency medicine becomes sturdier (though certainly not yet complete), there seems to be space for this other, equally important side of myself.

The goals of this site will be severalfold and I'll attempt to outline them now to give myself a framework moving forward.
​
  • First, it will be a journal and witness to my experiences in the field of emergency medicine. For me, it will be a catharsis on the days that deplete me and a reckoning with the challenges of the practice of medicine. For anyone reading, I hope I can offer some small amount of inspiration or insight.
  • ​Some pieces will explore a clinical vignette. Some will be educational in nature. Some will offer opinions on aspects of practice. Some will be weighty, while others may be humorous. All will deal with the practice of medicine, its blistering highs and searing lows, its strange intricacies and customs, its failings, and, most importantly, its rich stories.
  • While I will always endeavor for accuracy, these pieces will not be exhaustive reviews of the medical literature and should not be taken as such. If specific clinical information or patient stories are presented, details may be omitted or changed in order to fully safeguard the privacy of my patients and my colleagues.
  • Most often, I will speak to those in the field of emergency medicine, to my resident colleagues, attendings, other EM physicians, nurses, physicians assistants, EMS and all those who have chosen to inhibit this peculiar, strange, exhilarating and sometimes heart-breaking corner of clinical practice. But I will do my best to write in a manner accessible to other clinicians and to the general reader.
  • And finally, a dry, but necessary disclaimer: All views and opinions expressed on this site are and will be solely my own and do not represent those of Brigham & Women's Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital, the Harvard-Affiliated Emergency Medicine Residency (HAEMR) Program, ProEMS Center for Medics or any other institution with which I am affiliated. While I will discuss medical topics and the practice of emergency medicine, views expressed here do not constitute specific medical advice or clinical practice recommendations.
​
And with that, I'd like to re-inaugerate joshuacolin.com. For all of us, clinical practice is just one facet of our lives. I hope that this site will serve as a new outlet for me, to inspire creativity, learning and excellence in clinical practice in both myself and others. Thanks for visiting and enjoy!

J

0 Comments

    Author

    Joshua Feblowitz, MD, MS, is currently a PGY4 resident in the BWH/MGH Harvard-Affiliated Emergency Medicine Residency (HAEMR) Program and a freelance science writer.

    Archives

    March 2019
    November 2018
    August 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017

    Categories

    All
    AliEM
    Education
    Emergency Medicine
    Essentials Of EM
    General
    Infectious Disease
    Influenza
    Overdose
    SAS
    Science Journalism
    Toxicology
    Writing

© COPYRIGHT 2017. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.